{{ citeText }}

{{ t.publishedIn }}

{{ t.usage }}

{{ t.license }}

{{ ann.title }}

{{ ann.p1 }}

{{ ann.p2 }}

{{ t.atGlance }}

{{ t.tplTitle }}

{{ t.authorGuidelines }}

General

The work of editor will be greatly facilitated if authors papers prepared in accordance with these guidelines. (This is after accepting the abstract by the editorial board).

Submission of a paper is understood to imply that it is original and has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and that if accepted it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language.

Only manuscripts submitted electronically as Microsoft word document (docx.) will be considered for publication. The manuscript must be submitted in 1.15-line spacing format, justified alignment, font Times New Roman, size 12, (except the Titel, size 14) and normal margin on A4 paper size should be used. Keywords should be at least three and not more than six.

Figures and tables embedded in an Office file should be saved as JPEG format. However, the editor recommends sending all the figures and tables contained in the manuscript in another separate file.

Text

The first text page should contain the title of the paper, the name(s) of the author(s), their full postal address written as font Times New Roman, size 10, and an abstract. The abstract should not exceed 300 words. It should provide a summary of the main achievements of the paper. It should not contain references.

The paper should conform to the following scheme as closely as possible:

1. Abstract.
2. Introduction. (to include methods, techniques, material studies, etc.)
3. Methodology.
4. Results and discussion.
5. Conclusions/summary.
6. Acknowledgements.
7. References.
8. Appendix/ices. (If any).

Headings

Four grades of headings are normally used in the proceedings:

1. FIRST-ORDER HEADING [capitals, centered].
2. Second-order heading [italics, at the margin]. Text follows on 2nd line.
3. Third-order heading [italics, at the margin] text follows on next line.
4. Fourth-order heading [italics, at the margin]. Text follows on the same line.

If a further sub-division is needed, (1), (2), (3), etc. or (a), (b), (c), etc. Should be used.

Use Standard English spelling (oxford English dictionary) not standard American spelling. Note particularly the following: palaeontology, palaeolake, meter/s, kilometers/s, center, etc. it will be helpful if you sent the spell check on your word processor to “English (UK)”.

Measurements and Numbers

• All measurements etc. should be metric and should follow the international system of units (SI), unless this is impossible (e.g., certain depth sounding machine read-outs, etc.).
• Equations should be numbered serially on the right-hand side, in parentheses. In the text they should be referred to as “Eq. (1)”: within mathematics they may be referred to by numbers alone. Equations require normal punctuation.
• Whole numbers of more than four digits are to be split into groups of three digits with spaces (NOT commas). Thus, to express thirty-two thousand one hundred and thirty-four: 32 134 (NOT 32,134). Four-digit numbers are kept together: 7341.
• Decimal fractions should ALWAYS have the zero leading the decimal: 0.637 NOT .637.
• There should NOT be a space between the degree symbol o and C or F, e.g., 37°C NOT 37° C. Likewise for sample numbers etc. 15a, 16b NOT 15 a, 17 b.
• Use lower case “n” for the word “numbers/s” when it is abbreviated, e.g., “sample no. 3” “well no’s 6 and 9”, etc.

References

• All references cited in the text and in the captions to figures and tables should be presented in list of references following the text, and vice versa-i.e. references not cited in the text or captions should not be included in the list. The manuscript should be carefully checked to ensure that the spelling of author’s names and dates given are the same in the text as in the references list. The accuracy of references is the responsibility of authors. Papers “in preparation” or “submitted” are not valid references. Work in preparation, unpublished abstracts, and personal and oral communications should be cited in the text but not in the reference list.
• If references are made in the text to publications written by more than two authors, the name of the first author should be used followed by “et al.” this indication should NEVER be used in the list of references where names of all co-authors should be given in full.
• References in the text should be arranged chronologically, e.g. “(Smith and Davidson, 1988; Hammuda et al., 1990; sebta and Busrewil, 1996)” or “according to Smith and Davidson (1988), depending on the context.
• The list of references should be arranged alphabetically by authors names, and then chronologically (i.e. by date) for each author. If an author’s name in the list is also mentioned with co-authors, the following order should be used: publications of the single author, arranged according to publication date; publications of the same author with one co-author, arranged alphabetically by 1st author and by 2nd author; publications of the same author with more than one co-author, arranged according to publication date.

The following examples of references cited from various sources (journal article, books, etc) should be followed. Note that the author’s names are in the following format: Large capitals and small capitals- ‘Smith” and NOT “SMITH” (all capitals). If you find this difficult to do, please just use large capitals and lowercase-smith” as this format is easier for the editors to correct, than all capitals.

• Periodical names should be given in full or abbreviated using the International List of Periodical Title Word Abbreviations or the Bibliographic Guide for Editors and Authors (The American Chemical Society, 1974).
• For publications in any language other than English, the original title is to be retained. However, the titles of Publications in non-Latin alphabets should be translated, and a notation such as “(in Russian )” or”(in Greek, with English abstract )” should be added.
• In referring to personal communication the two words are followed by the year, e.g., “(J.McNary, Pers. Comm., 1968)”.

{{ t.submissionDeclaration }}

{{ t.declIntro }}

1. {{ t.d1 }}
2. {{ t.d2 }}
3. {{ t.d3 }}
4. {{ t.d4 }}
5. {{ t.d5 }}
6. {{ t.d6 }}

{{ t.rulesEval }}

Rules For Evaluating Scientific Works Submitted For Publication In The Journal

In pursuit of the journal to present valuable scientific works, all scientific works submitted for publication on its pages are subject to confidential evaluation in accordance with the following rules and regulations: (This is after accepting the abstract by the editorial board).

1. The scientific works submitted for publication on the pages of the journal are evaluated by specialized professors who are certified for their competence and integrity.
2. Evaluators evaluate the scientific works without prejudice to them and submit their observations and scientific opinions about them in writing according to the forms prepared by the editorial board of the journal.
3. The evaluator is committed to confidentiality and objectivity in the evaluation, following the scientific methods of evaluation (objectivity and formality).
4. The degree of evaluation of scientific work shall be one hundred marks according to the following bases:

• The results of the evaluation are as follows: Publishable with notes, Unfit for publication.
• Scientific work is not accepted for publication unless it obtains 70% of the prescribed grades.

The specified period of evaluation is 15 days from the date of receipt of the reviewer for the scientific work. If the period lapses without the reviewer submitting the results of his evaluation, the editorial board may dispense with his evaluation and not count it, and his right to claim the evaluation reward is forfeited, and the editorial board refers the work to another reviewer, and the evaluation results may be accepted if the reviewer presents the reasons for the delay if accepted by the editorial committee.

The scientific work is returned to its sources, accompanied by the evaluator’s notes to adopt it or push it on practical grounds, in the event that the evaluator concludes that the work is valid for publication with observations, and if opinions conflict and conflict between the results of the evaluation and the submitter of the scientific material, the scientific material is referred to an arbitrator for weighting, and the editorial committee has the final decision in this regard. Scientific works are evaluated on the special forms prepared by the editorial committee. The evaluation results are confidential, and the journal’s editorial committee is committed to their confidentiality and Nondisclosure.

Publishing controls in the journal

Steps and conditions for publishing in the journal

Preliminary arbitration criteria for acceptance of publication in the journal

1. It is characterized by scientific methodology and modernity in subject and presentation.
2. keeping in mind the correctness of the language and validity of the research method.
3. The number of research pages should not exceed 20 pages.

Publication steps

Sending the abstract of the scientific paper to be published in the name of the editor-in-chief of the journal by e-mail according to the forms prepared on the journal’s website, accompanied by the researcher’s acknowledgment form, noting that the research has not been previously published in any journal, or submitting it to any other party before submitting it to the journal.

1. The abstract is discussed in the periodic meeting of the editorial committee of the journal to determine the scientific competence of the research and then assign its topic to the competent member of the committee to express an initial opinion regarding the validity of its topic for publication or not.
2. The researcher shall be notified of receiving the research abstract within a period not exceeding two weeks.
3. When the abstract of the paper is accepted, the researcher is asked to send the entire research according to the terms and rules of publication published on the journal’s website.
4. The editorial committee of the journal, in its periodic meeting, conducts the initial examination of the research formats and conformity with the conditions of publication in the journal, if it conforms to the conditions and rules of publication, the research is assigned to the competent member of the journal’s editorial committee for preliminary evaluation.
5. The paper is passed on (plagiarism checker program) to monitor and prevent scientific citation in writing scientific papers submitted to the journal’s editorial committee.
6. Sending the research to the arbitrators for final arbitration, where the professors of the specialty who attest to them competence and integrity evaluate the scientific works submitted for publication in the journal. In this direction, the evaluator is committed to confidentiality and objectivity in the evaluation, following the scientific methods of evaluation. The editorial committee of the journal is also committed to complete confidentiality in the evaluation of the arbitrators.
7. Notify the researcher via e-mail of the final arbitration result.
8. The researcher makes amendments or notes, if any, based on the arbitrator’s decision before the final publication of the research.
9. publish the research in the next issue of the journal.